Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Social Justice as a Mirage and Terms Samples †

Question: Discuss about the Social Justice as a Mirage and Terms. Answer: Social Justice refers to the concept that is fair and just in relation of the individual human being and the society. The degree of social justice is measured by the explicit and the implicit terms for the distribution of the wealth, opportunity of the activities of an individual and the privileges in the society. With the help of social justice, the human beings are assigned the rights and duties in the institutions of the society (Pennock 2015). This enables the receiving of the basic advantages and the burden of the cooperation. Not all the people can be equally entitled to respect their fellow mates. The attainable degree of social justice is unfeasible and it may lead to the destruction of the liberty of the individuals. There is as such no analysis to state what is socially unjust. This is because there are no such rules and regulations to determine the observance that would secure the individual characters and the social groups to appear as just. Social justice is chief to bot h social democracy and socialism as well. Social justice cannot be similar in temperament with the idea for the rule of law. Friedrich Hayek supported the idea of social justice but later on realized that the concept was meaningless (Hayek 2012). The specific groups that want to pressurize apply the phrase social justice by providing the demand in an unquestionable manner. These groups often use the social justice as a means of the political scenario so that they transfer from the other groups. Hayek comments that the phrase does not mean anything as the concept is fraudulent. There is inequality in the society of today and hence the respective governments tend to treat the people in an unjust manner. Not everyone can be equally provided social justice. The social justice is an indefinable concept. The objective of the theoretical framework of falters at the structural foundation when it is analyzed. Hayek wanted to meticulously define the term social justice and the meaning that people attain from it (Lister 2013). The concept of the distributive justice among the people of the society is understood as the characteristic of the conduct of an individual. Hayek defines the sentiments as an instrument for the destruction of the values that are there in a free civilization. He shows the risks that are involved in these instruments of the fine sentiments. These offend the strength of the moral feelings of an individual. Hayek argues against the superstitious notion of social justice that is followed by the men and women of the society. The men and women of the society according to Hayek regard the social justice as a new religion and are recognized by the good man. Hayek has made valuable contributions towards the erosion of the individual liberties. He encouraged the beginning of totalitarianism (Lewis 2012). Social justice cannot be clearly defined and Hayek provides his argument on it that is not reliable in nature. Hayek argues that in a society, that is complex in nature and the individuals in this society are free to pursue their needs. This cannot enable a unified concept of justice for all the inhabitants of the society. Hayek argues that the political outfits and the law should not enable the granting of the certain special privileges or the issuing of specific orders to the particular individuals and groups in this complex society. Hence, the inequalities in the expectations cannot become the reason for the balancing of the side for the people who are less fortunate in nature (Lapum et al. 2012). Hayek does not provide a clear definition of the term social justice. His dismissal of the use of the social justice by the society is quite early. The Law tries to balance between the privileged and the unprivileged by taking from one and then providing to the other. This tends to incre ase the wealth and well-being of the individuals in the long term. Justice is to be looked by the actions of the individuals in concern and not by the impulsive order of the events. Hayek states the concept of social justice being meaningless. There should be the maintenance of the order in the society and not providing the particular needs of an individual. However, not providing individual needs to the public in the society may lead to the chaos in the society. The reasons provided by Hayek are in an abstract form (Bogotch 2014). There is no way that can control the actions of the individual to attain their needs. Nevertheless, he also states how the individual can benefit the society that undermines the value that is derived from the society. References Bogotch, I., 2014. Educational theory: The specific case of social justice as an educational leadership construct. InInternational handbook of educational leadership and social (in) justice(pp. 51-65). Springer Netherlands. Hayek, F.A., 2012.Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Routledge. Lapum, J., Hamzavi, N., Veljkovic, K., Mohamed, Z., Pettinato, A., Silver, S. and Taylor, E., 2012. A performative and poetical narrative of critical social theory in nursing education: An ending and threshold of social justice.Nursing Philosophy,13(1), pp.27-45. Lewis, P., 2012. Emergent properties in the work of Friedrich Hayek.Journal of Economic Behavior Organization,82(2), pp.368-378. Lister, A., 2013. The mirage of social justice: Hayek against (and for) Rawls.Critical Review,25(3-4), pp.409-444. Pennock, J.R., 2015.Democratic political theory. Princeton University Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.